arXiv 'in ortaya cikardigi Türk hirsizlarin
Romanya'daki ortagi Irina Radinschi..
Ona ait makaleler Turnitin programina
taratildiginda neredeyse tamaminin
"overall similarity index>65%"
gozukmektedir.
Dicle ve Canakkale sebekeleri
kendisinden aldiklari mesajlari
internette dagittilar.
"eksi sozluk"te bile var.
Bu hanimin ulkesinde "plagiarism" sorununun
boyutlarini ve devletin yaklasimini anlamak icin
asagidaki videoyu izleyin lutfen.
http://www.mediascrape.com/News/ViewNewsItem.aspx?newsItemId=33310&rootVideoPanelType=1
Diger bir ulke Cin..Oradaki durumla ilgili bazi
dokumanlar asagidaki baglantilarda:
http://www.newsgd.com/culture/universities/200603150020.htm
http://english.ipr.gov.cn/ipr/en/info/Article.jsp?a_no=48275&col_no=925&dir=200701
Pakistan'da ise durum soyle:
http://www.hec.gov.pk/new/download/whats%20new/plagarism.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.newsgd.com/culture/universities/200603150020.htm
| Plagiarism, research frauds plague academia |
| Latest Updated by 2006-03-15 15:17:32 |
| As China marks the World Consumer Rights Day today, the spotlight would inevitably be on poor products and shoddy service. But attention is also being focused on the rights of a special group of consumers: subscribers or readers of academic journals. Plagiarism and fake research have become rampant in China, and are eroding people's trust in academia, Ren Yuing, a member of the Councillors' Office of the State Council, told the recent meeting of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, the top advisory body. He cited a recent survey of 180 PhD degree holders, of whom 60 per cent paid to be published in academic journals; and about the same percentage copied others' work. "The situation exists in almost every well-known Chinese university," He Weifang, a professor at Peking University's law school, told China Daily. He is also an activist in fighting what he called academic corruption. Some 100 Chinese professors plan to publish an open letter calling for the establishment of a national supervision mechanism to root out academic plagiarism. The move follows a series of academic scandals: Qiu Xiaoqing, a biomedicine professor at Sichuan University, was last year accused of publishing fraudulent research in the November 2003 issue of Nature Biotechnology. Zhou Yezhong, a professor at Wuhan University's law school, was last December accused of copying others' work "word for word." Shen Luwei, an associate professor at Tianjin Foreign Studies University, was removed from his post in January for plagiarizing 10 articles in his book. He Weifang said he felt obliged to sign the open letter as the problem has been holding back the country's scientific development. Academic corruption refers to institutions making use of their resources to gain improper income or power; but misconduct, which is often individual, could take different forms such as plagiarism, distorting experiment data and tampering with original work. The existing evaluation system, which emphasizes the quantity of papers rather than quality, is considered the root cause of academic corruption and misconduct in China ?scholars have to publish a certain number of books or papers before they are promoted. "One of my colleagues was demoted because he failed to publish two papers in key academic journals a year,?He said. "The situation in other schools is worse.? Zhang Jianzu, a professor at East China University of Science and Technology, said schools are to blame as they often help cover up misconduct. "Many plagiarists still work as professors despite some scandals,?he said. Some plagiarists also hold administrative positions in schools. To curb violations of academic rights, the Ministry of Education announced this month that it planned to set up a national supervision committee. It will work out detailed rules on criteria and punishment for academic corruption and misconduct, and investigate such cases. The 25-member committee will consist of scholars from academic institutions. Vice-Minister of Science and Technology Ma Songde also disclosed that the ministry would establish an archive database, including books and papers the ministry published. "If any academic violation is found, the stain will be on record for good,?Ma said. Academic circles applaud the new policies, but how the committee and database will work has sparked heated discussion. He Weifang insists that the committee be made up of scholars, and procedures be transparent. "Also, those being accused should have the right to appeal.? He argues that the ministry's committee cannot replace committees set up by individual schools, as "administrative powers should not interfere too much in academic circles.? Qin Yi, editor-in-chief of Social Sciences in China, a prominent periodical published by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said rigorous checking is vital to prevent plagiarism. She told China Daily that no plagiarism had been found in papers published in her magazine. Manuscripts go through at least three rounds of checks, including anonymous refereeing. Reputed scholars from other academic institutions are also invited to evaluate each paper, as "no matter how knowledgeable our editors are, there might be books they have not read.? Plagiarism is also prevalent among college students, especially for graduation thesis. Xu Zhihong, president of Peking University, said last week that the university would announce detailed regulations later this year to look into teachers' responsibilities if plagiarism is found in their students?theses. The school announced last year that students would be expelled if they were involved in plagiarism. Editor: Wing |
| By: Source:China Daily Website |
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
http://english.ipr.gov.cn/ipr/en/info/Article.jsp?a_no=48275&col_no=925&dir=200701
| China sets up supervision office to curb scientific misconduct |
 |
| 01-19-2007 |
China has announced the establishment of a science ethics committee and a supervision office to stem academic fraud and plagiarism, according to the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). The office is responsible for building up a fraud investigation team, case discussion and handling, and handing down punishments for science frauds, Mei Yonghong, director of the policy and regulation department with MOST, told a regular press conference. MOST released a set of trial rules to deal with scientific fraud last November, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2007. The regulation is regarded as first unified one of its kind to bring scientific misconduct under the country's legal system. The acts of falsifying resumes, plagiarizing works of others, fabricating scientific data and violating regulations governing research on humans and animals will incur punishments ranging from a standard warning to disqualification from state science projects for life, according to the regulation. These efforts follow a string of scandals involving academic fraud and plagiarism in the country as China continues to advocate,and invest huge amounts in innovation. Top scientist Chen Jin was sacked from the prestigious ShanghaiJiaotong University last May for fabricating data relating to a digital computer chip that was developed with state-funding. A professor at the elite Tsinghua University in Beijing, Liu Hui, was removed from his post in March for fabricating his academic achievements and work experience. Last April, Yang Jie, former director of the Life Science and Technology Institute at the prestigious Tongji University in Shanghai, was sacked after the veracity of his academic record was questioned. "We also plan to set up a team of experts from various fields and countries to hold consultations and offer advice regarding major scientific misconduct," said Mei. (Source: Xinhua) |
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
http://www.hec.gov.pk/new/download/whats%20new/plagarism.htm
Universities Must Take Strict Action
"Zero Tolerance Against Plagiarism"
Taking serious note of the lack of effective disciplinary action against faculty members of the Centre for High Energy Physics (CHEP), University of the Punjab, who were guilty of plagiarism (cheating by copying materials and publishing it as their own), the Higher Education Commission has decided not to entertain any development grants or increase the recurring grant for University in the next financial year.
In light of the decisions taken in a meeting with the Prime Minister that governance and quality assurance issues should be linked to funding, any university refusing to take tough action against plagiarism and intellectual theft will have its grants cut-off.
'Universities are expected to put a stop to such malpractices, instead of condoning them. It must be realized by all that plagiarism is academic death for a faculty member. His academic career must end if he is found guilty', said Prof. Dr. Atta-ur-Rahman, Chairman Higher Education Commission.
HEC will block any further development grants andincrease in recurring grants of those universities which fail to take any clear and decisive action regarding such issues. Plagiarism has always existed but for last five decades, people involved in it were able to go scot free. For the first time in the history of Pakistan, the HEC has adopted a policy of zero tolerance against plagiarism and directed universitiesto beware of such activities and take stiff action.
CHEP has been at the centre of a plagiarism scandal which has involved the Centre's Director, Dr. Fazl-i-Aleem and lecturers, Mr. Maqsood Ahmad, Mr. Sohail Afzal Tahir, Mr. Alam Saeed and Mr.
Rashid Ahmad. The Higher Education Commission had demanded an inquiry into the allegations which culminated in the University Syndicate's decision to issue only a warning to the faculty members. Rashid Ahmad, Sohail Afzal Tahir, M. Alam Saeed and Maqsood Ahmad, faculty members of the CHEP have copied excerpts of an article by renowned physicist Prof. Chris Llewellyn Smith, former Director General CERN and got it published by their names entitled “Science in Africa” in a South African international publication without acknowledging any reference to the original author. The complaint concerning the intellectual theft was also made to the Chairman HEC by the Adviser to Director General CERN, Geneva.
The Commission was of the view that teachers serve as a role model to the student community. It noted with satisfaction the tremendous work being carried out by university teachers and researchers which has led to unprecedented growth in international publications emanating from Pakistan.
The Commission noted that the Chancellors Committee at its meeting held on May 11, 2006 had resolved that 'The HEC quality criteria for appointment and promotion of faculty members, criteria for MPhil/PhD programmes and other governance issues should be strictly implemented by all the universities without any amendments within four months, and in future funding by HEC to universities should be linked to strict adherence to all HEC Quality Assurance Criteria”.
The Commission decided that in case the action recommended against the plagiarists of PunjabUniversity was inappropriate, the Chancellor (Governor, Punjab) would be approached to take suomoto action commensurate with the gravity of the crime committed.
It was decided that a blacklist should be created on the HEC website which should give the names and designations as well as other information about proven cases of plagiarism. The Commission approved the acquisition of anti-plagiarism software that would check publications and research reports emanating from institutions of higher learning. Use of unethical means by a small minority of researchers will not be allowed to tarnish the excellent work of a majority of hard working researchers in Pakistan.
